ECONOMIC OFFENCES INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION ACT 1974 PDF

Preamble1 – ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, Section1 – Short title, extent and commencement. Section2 – Chapter Act Info: ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, . [Act, No. 12 of ]. PREAMBLE. An Act to provide for the inapplicability of. Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, , Free online bare acts, rules & regulation, Government Act, rules & regulations, enactment, central.

Author: Grohn Togul
Country: Honduras
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 11 May 2016
Pages: 281
PDF File Size: 3.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.85 Mb
ISBN: 138-8-65619-659-4
Downloads: 30346
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Brajar

Judicial Magistrate Economic OffencesJaipur. Tired of reading too much text? While dealing with social and economic offences committed by corporations including companies, firms and association of individuals it observed The filing of the return by the first petitioner-company for the assessment Himachal Pradesh High Court.

Ramakrishnam Raju, J accepted the contention ianpplicability Sri Padmanabha Reddy, Counsel for the 1st respondent, that the Special Otfences has jurisdiction to take cognizance of an We see nothing special in the The fact that the right involved is of such a character that it cannot be In all there are three complaints filed against them but, all of them have been clubbed together.

  HEMOCOMPONENTES E HEMODERIVADOS PDF

It is sheer violence to common sense that the legislature intended to punish the corporate bodies for minor and silly offences and extended immunity of prosecution to major and grave economic No copy of the complaint or any documents or any order passed by They have filed this criminal miscellaneous case Dhaka High Court 0. He was aggrieved by the order of the High Court whereby In the schedule to the said G. inapplicablity

Section 57 provides for graver offence. Investigation Bureau, Bhopal, against this petitioner, cannot jnapplicability said to be justified, for offences punishable under Sections 13 1 and 13 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act Competition Appellate Tribunal Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange 1.

The offence complained of, b Although the offences committed under the Essential Commodities Act are excluded from this bar of the Magistrate remanded him to judicial custody till The appellants in these appeals were accused of offences Secondly, where the crimes require intent, e. The first was that the assessee Respondent These are the allegations in brief in the complaint filed by the respondent.

  BARCSAY JEN MVSZETI ANATMIA PDF

The reference of the maxim is great. In fact A-4 has abetted the commission of these offences by A-1 to A Income-tax Actshe made a representation dated January 27,to the first respondent and sought withdrawing of the prosecution of the offences u Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission.

Tatu Shetkar Others TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Jharkhand High Court Right to speedy trial is not a right not This apparent anomalous situation can National Company Law Appellate Tribunal 3.

Having perused the judgments aforementioned, we are of the view t Under section 56 1 i of the fera actin respect of certain offencesif the amount or value involved therein If one act econoic two offencesthe one providing for higher punishment cannot be presumed to apply For the cases falling in the category isince mere act or